Monday, 20 February 2012

The Mark of the Beast

I don't want to freak anyone who is superstitious... but I was checking my Blogger stats last night and I noticed that my recent post on Dexter had had a significant number of readers:


Damien...

3 comments:

Raybeard said...

I think anyone who really is superstitious may be reassured by knowing that '666' is now generally accepted as being a mis-translation,
The actual 'Number of the Beast' in the Book of Revelations should, in fact, be the slightly less attention-grabbing 'six-THREE-six'.

Stephen Chapman said...

Dont spoil it Ray! Devilishly good fun.

Raybeard said...

I know, I know. But I suppose if anyone has decided that s/he is superstitious then, despite the irrationality of it, they'll be determined to retain that characteristic as part of their self-identity.