Pages

Monday, 20 February 2012

The Mark of the Beast

I don't want to freak anyone who is superstitious... but I was checking my Blogger stats last night and I noticed that my recent post on Dexter had had a significant number of readers:


Damien...

3 comments:

  1. I think anyone who really is superstitious may be reassured by knowing that '666' is now generally accepted as being a mis-translation,
    The actual 'Number of the Beast' in the Book of Revelations should, in fact, be the slightly less attention-grabbing 'six-THREE-six'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dont spoil it Ray! Devilishly good fun.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know, I know. But I suppose if anyone has decided that s/he is superstitious then, despite the irrationality of it, they'll be determined to retain that characteristic as part of their self-identity.

    ReplyDelete

While I welcome a frank and free exchange of views, comments which I consider to be offensive will be removed.

If I have enabled comment moderation - which may occur occasionally, I shall review and publish comments as soon as practicable.